Fracture Resistance of MOD Cavities Restored with Short Fibre, Long Fibre, & Ribbond Reinforcements: An in-vitro Comparative Study

Authors

  • Gayatri H. Giramkar Post Graduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Peoples College of Dental Sciences & Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India Author
  • Anu Narang Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Peoples College of Dental Sciences & Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India Author
  • Santosh Kumar Singh Professor & Head, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Peoples College of Dental Sciences & Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India Author
  • Shivani Rawat Post Graduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Peoples College of Dental Sciences & Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India Author
  • Sadhvi Pateriya Post Graduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Peoples College of Dental Sciences & Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India Author
  • Naman Keshwani Post Graduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Peoples College of Dental Sciences & Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71393/5hft8114

Keywords:

Fracture resistance; MOD cavity; Short fibre composite; Long fibre reinforcement; Ribbond; Fibre-reinforced composite.

Abstract

Introduction: Mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavity preparations significantly weaken posterior teeth by reducing cuspal stiffness and increasing susceptibility to fracture. Fibre-reinforced composite systems have been introduced to enhance the mechanical performance and longevity of restorations.

Aim & Objective: To compare the fracture resistance and failure patterns of MOD cavities restored with short fibre composite, long fibre reinforcement, and Ribbond reinforcement with those restored using conventional composite resin.

Materials & Methods: Forty extracted human molars with standardized MOD cavity preparations were randomly allocated into four groups (n = 10 each): Group I (conventional composite), Group II (short fibre composite), Group III (long fibre reinforcement), and Group IV (Ribbond reinforcement). Following restoration, specimens underwent compressive loading in a universal testing machine until fracture. Fracture resistance was recorded in Newtons (N), and failure modes were classified as restorable or non-restorable. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test.

Results: Fracture resistance differed significantly among the groups (F = 1357.26, p < 0.001). Group II showed the highest mean fracture resistance (1197.50 ± 15.14 N), followed by Group III (1037.50 ± 15.14 N), Group IV (956.30 ± 9.83 N), and Group I (787.00 ± 16.02 N). Compared with the control group, short fibre, long fibre, and Ribbond reinforcement increased fracture resistance by 52.2%, 31.8%, and 21.5%, respectively. Reinforced restorations also demonstrated a higher proportion of restorable fractures, with the short fibre group showing the most favorable failure pattern (80%).

Conclusion: Fibre reinforcement significantly improves fracture resistance and promotes more favorable failure modes in MOD restorations. Short fibre composite demonstrated the best overall performance.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Fracture Resistance of MOD Cavities Restored with Short Fibre, Long Fibre, & Ribbond Reinforcements: An in-vitro Comparative Study. (2026). Journal of Recent Advances in Applied Sciences (pISSN 0970-1990), 41(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.71393/5hft8114